I don’t know if we need another one, but here is a review of a new biography of Dietrich Bonhoeffer.
Evidently Charles Marsh indulges in a little speculative psychoanalysis about Bonhoeffer’s relationship with Eberhard Bethge, suggesting a latent homosexual attraction. This speculation, based on no evidence other than reading between the lines in the letters, of course could be neither proven nor refuted.
I think it does show a pretty serious failure to understand Bonhoeffer. First of all, he had no use for psychoanalysis; he described it as a secular version of religious fanaticism. Revivalist preachers tried to convince decent, honest people that they were miserable sinners, and psychoanalysts tried to convince happy, well-adjusted folk that they are inwardly miserable. Bonhoeffer believed private matters should be kept private and one should not speak in public about sexuelle Dinge. Aha, proof of repression? I think rather it reflects his aristocratic upbringing and some honest convictions about propriety and ethics.
In his Ethics Bonhoeffer followed traditional categories of duty, vocation, family, work, government. But He also said there is another realm where ethical behavior is realized, and that is the area of freedom. To this area he assigned friendship. He recognized a failure in previous attempts to define and describe ethical behavior without recognizing the importance of deep and abiding friendships not confined by categories of duty but developed in the realm of freedom.
One of the failures of a lot of our thinking today is a lack of imagination and vocabulary to appreciate the value of friendship. Dietrich Bonhoeffer and Eberhard Bethge certainly did love one another. It was a deep human and Christian friendship.