What is heresy?

Strictly speaking, a heretic is one who causes divisions in the church by teaching an aberrant doctrine in an attempt to draw followers after himself.  A person who privately holds some views or entertains discussions on issue not considered orthodox is not a heretic until he becomes divisive about it.

What is heresy? One definition would be a doctrine that has been condemned by a council.  The Fifth Ecumenical Council is often thought to be a condemnation of universalism, because it condemns the teachings of Origen by name.  But the specific issue was Origen’s belief in the preexistence of souls; it was his belief that these souls would be restored to their original state that was condemned by the council.

The Council never condemned universalism universally, in all its forms.  The Council never mentioned Gregory of Nyssa who taught a form of universalism but whose theology was otherwise orthodox.  In fact Gregory is still considered on of the greatest fathers of the church.  (See Robin Parry’s discussion)

On the other hand, the council of Orange specifically condemned the teaching that God predestines anyone to evil:

We not only do not believe that any are foreordained to evil by the power of God, but even state with utter abhorrence that if there are those who want to believe so evil a thing, they are anathema.

Historians say this statement was specifically directed toward those who teach “double predestination,” i.e., the belief that some have been ordained by God to reject his grace.  They of course did not condemn Augustine by name even though many believed this was implied by his teachings.  Otherwise the council of Orange fully supported Augustine against Pelagius.

Still, by the standard of church councils, we have to admit that universalism per se has never been condemned as heresy, but the doctrine that often passes by the name of Reformed theology has been given the official anathema.

Ernest Tubb, Hank Jr., and others had a country song a few years back, “I Guess We Should Have Left Him Alone and Let Him Sing His Song.”  One line keeps ringing in my mind (it sounds better when I can hear the tune),

If we don’t like the way he sings, who’s gonna cast the first stone?

2 Responses

  1. Really like this post – a lot.

    I have wondered about what exactly is heresy many times. I believe I have heard or read that it is basically anything that detracts from the work of Christ. What say you of that Dr. A?

    In that way of thinking I can clearly see how “Reformed Theology” certain detracts from His work…

    So very interseting on the Council of Orange comment.

  2. My definition of heresy would be something like this:
    1. Teaching strange doctrines about the nature of God, Christ, or the Holy Spirit,
    2. In a divisive way.

    Heresy is when one “draws away disciples” after himself. Having unorthodox thoughts or opinions is not necessarily heresy until one makes those opinions the test of the validity of others’ faith.

    Heresy goes at the heart of the faith, and does so in a divisive and destructive way. I haven’t yet gotten a copy of “Love Wins,” but as I understand it, Bell raises questions and makes suggestions–I don’t think that reaches the level of heresy, even if one does not like the implications of his questions and suggestions.

    You can see I’m behind schedule–about six months late in answering your comment and also in reviewing “Love Wins.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: