Lethal injection is considered a humane and sanitary means of dispatching convicted murderers. Inserting an IV requires skill and training. Here is what one nurse says,
Past experiences influence my belief that the essential vein will not be accessed on the first try. Despite the diminutive size of the needle, there is still pain with it’s insertion.
Worse than blood draws is the starting of an IV for either medication or for hydration. Now, we’re talking about a much larger IV needle. I have started IV’s for 30 years and never had one myself until six years ago, where it took the nurse four tries before she called another nurse to successfully start my IV. The first nurse was frustrated which only added to her difficulty with each of her next several attempts. I was so tense, that my veins went into hiding, “determined” to not be accessed by anyone! (More here)
So, if we are going to have lethal injections we need trained professionals, specifically nurses, to do the deed. But what if most nurses are conscientiously opposed to killing? When the federal prison in Indiana needed an executioner for Timothy McVeigh in 2001, they had to go all the way to Missouri to find a nurse willing to inject the poison cocktail. David Pinkley was on probation in a plea bargain after stalking and threatening another man and his family. He was willing to use his medical skills to end the life of America’s most notorious mass murderer (more here). Presumably, he followed procedure and used an alcohol swab before delivering the potion (see Why an Alcohol Swab).
What would happen if all nurses refused to volunteer for the work of execution? Would there be some sort of draft? Would it be like jury duty?
Should nurses who conscientiously object be protected–or should they be fired if they refuse a summons to execution duty?
Do we want health care professionals with a conscience, or do we want doctors like Joseph Mengele and his subordinates who mindlessly followed his orders?